MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098885946 · doi:10.1051/fruits:2001136

Fumigation with acetic acid vapor to control decay of stored apples

2001· article· en· W2098885946 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFruits · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFumigationAcetic acidHorticultureChemistryBotanyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Apples are potentially subject to blue mold decay caused by Penicillium expansum if stored at 1 °C for three or more months or if wounded during handling. Results from trials with apples contaminated with conidia of P. expansum and fumigated in small chambers with acetic acid (AA) vapor indicated that fruit could be sterilized to reduce decay without effect on fruit quality. The objective of this study was to determine if larger quantities of apples treated with AA vapor would have less decay after storage and/or wounding. It was also important to determine if fumigation would affect apple quality and aroma. Materials and methods. Apple cultivars were harvested at commercial maturity for use in AA fumigation trials. Apples artificially or naturally contaminated with conidia of P. expansum were fumigated with AA vapor in a 1 m3 gas tight chamber at 10 °C for 1 h to 24 h or dipped in 450 μg thiabendazole × L-1 solution. Fruit fumigated in standard wooden or plastic apple boxes, or small wooden bins were either wounded and evaluated for decay after a week at 20 °C or stored at 1 °C for three or more months and evaluated for decay. Then apple quality was assessed. Results. Apples naturally contaminated with Penicillium spp. that had been stored at 1 °C in air storage and treated with AA vapour had 50% less decay than the control fruit. In another experiment, AA fumigation was as effective as thiabendazole in reducing decay. AA fumigation reduced decay of fruit coming out of storage for apples stored for 3 months, and a second AA fumigation reduced infection of wounds on these same apples. AA fumigation before storage did not affect apple quality or vinegar aroma. Discussion. AA fumigation showed great potential for reducing decay in stored apples. It could be used as an organic alternative to synthetic fungicides for control of blue mold decay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it