MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098944725 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2007.900176

A 1-V CMOS Current Reference With Temperature and Process Compensation

2007· article· en· W2098944725 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhalim Bendali, Yves Audet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransimpedance amplifierNMOS logicCMOSElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)TransistorCompensation (psychology)AmplifierOperational amplifierVoltagePhysicsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 1-V current reference fabricated in a standard CMOS process is described. Temperature compensation is achieved from a bandgap reference core using a transimpedance amplifier in order to generate an intermediate voltage reference, VREF. This voltage applied to the gate of a carefully sized nMOS output transistor provides a reference drain current, IREF, nearly independent of temperature by mutual compensation of mobility and threshold voltage variations. The circuit topology allows for compensation of threshold voltage variation due to process parameters as well. The current reference has been fabricated in a standard 0.18-mum CMOS process. Results from nineteen samples measured over a temperature range of 0degC to 100degC , showed values of IREFof 144.3 muA plusmn 7% and VREFof 610.9 mV plusmn 2% due to the combined effect of temperature and process variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations142
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207