MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098945664 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226035

A constraint programming approach for the design problem of cellular wireless networks

2004· article· en· W2098945664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceHeuristicBase stationWirelessTransceiverComputer networkWireless networkCellular networkBase transceiver stationMathematical optimizationConstraint programmingDistributed computingWi-Fi arrayEngineeringMathematicsStochastic programmingTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a constraint programming model for the design problem of cellular wireless communication networks. It consists of selecting the location of the base station controllers (BSCs) and mobile service switching centres (MSCs), selecting their types, designing the network topology and selecting the link types, and considering the location of base transceiver stations (BTSs). Next, we propose a heuristic to find a good solution of the model in a reasonable amount of time. This heuristic is a local search combined with constraint programming techniques. Numerical results show that our approach, on average, found better solutions than the best algorithm of the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207