MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098990191 · doi:10.1109/cca.2005.1507195

Nonlinear control of FACTS and HVDC belonging to the voltage-source converter family

2005· article· en· W2098990191 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Lu, B.T. Ooi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemUnified power flow controllerConvertersControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)AC powerTransformation (genetics)Controller (irrigation)Function (biology)Computer scienceBilinear interpolationControl engineeringVoltageElectric power systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Power flowPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nonlinear control method, associated with the books of A. Isidori (1989), and H. Nijmeijer and A. J. van der Shaft (1990), has so far been applied to the STATCOM (system order, N=3). There have been two hindrances to progress: (1) synthesizing the nonlinear transformation function which is the key to the method; (2) unfamiliarity with the advanced mathematical language. This paper describes the successful application off the method to the unified power flow controller (UPFC) (N=5). The paper is written in a tutorial form to give insights into how the nonlinear transformation function can be synthesized for voltage-source converters, where the bilinear nonlinearity has its origin from the power balance equation relating the ac-side power to the dc-side power. The objective is to explain the method in more accessible mathematical language so that more power electronic engineers can also use the nonlinear control method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207