MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099035905 · doi:10.1002/nme.2618

An extended QR‐solver for large profiled matrices

2009· article· en· W2099035905 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Ruess, Peter Jan Pahl

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsConvergence (economics)SolverComputationApplied mathematicsMathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)Extension (predicate logic)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new method for the solution of the standard eigenvalue problem with large symmetric profile matrices is presented. The method is based on the well‐known QR‐method for dense matrices. A new, flexible and reliable extension of the method is developed that is highly suited for the independent computation of any set of eigenvalues. In order to analyze the weak convergence of the method in the presence of clustered eigenvalues, the QR‐method is studied. Two effective, stable and numerically cheap extensions are introduced to overcome the troublesome stagnation of the convergence. A repeated preconditioning process in combination with Jacobi rotations in the parts of the matrix with the strongest convergence is developed to significantly improve both local and global convergence. The extensions preserve the profile structure of the matrix. The efficiency of the new method is demonstrated with several examples. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in EngineeringSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207