MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099063072 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2011.5981278

Silicon-die thermal monitoring using embedded sensor cells unit

2011· article· en· W2099063072 on OpenAlexafffund
Michel Saydé, Oussama Berriah, Ahmed Lakhssassi, Mohammed Bougataya, Emmanuel Kengne, Larbi Talbi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationMicroelectromechanical systemsDie (integrated circuit)ChipIntegrated circuitThermalElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceStack (abstract data type)Computer scienceTemperature measurementSiliconElectrical engineeringEngineeringOptoelectronicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal monitoring is essential in integrated circuit (IC) and VLSI chip which are a multilayer structure and a stack of different materials. The increase of the internal temperature of the VLSI circuits can conduct to serious thermal and also thermo-mechanical problems. Due to aggressive technology scaling, VLSI integration density as well as power density increases drastically. Thermal phenomena research activities on micro-scale level are essential for SoC and MEMS-based applications. However, various measurement techniques are needed to understand the thermal behavior of VLSI chip. In particular, measurement techniques for surface temperature distributions of large VLSI systems are a highly challenging research topic. This paper presents an algorithm and the experimental result of silicon-die thermal monitoring method using embedded sensor cells unit. Sensor implementation results and analysis are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207