Expression and Distribution of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Flk-1 in the Rat Pituitary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) acts primarily as an endothelial cell mitogen via the specific receptors Flk-1 and Flt-1. To help further define the possible role of VEGF in the control of pituitary cell function, we examined Flk-1 expression in normal rat pituitaries and in GH3 cells. Flk-1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and double-labeling immunofluorescence combined with confocal laser microscopy. In normal rat pituitaries, Flk-1-immunoreactive cells appeared widely distributed only in the anterior lobe and were not detected in the intermediate or posterior lobe. Apart from the adenohypophysial cells, Flk-1 immunopositivity was also evident in endothelial cells of many capillaries distributed throughout the gland. Immunohistochemistry also showed that majority of GH3 cells expressed Flk-1 protein. In situ hybridization showed conclusive staining with the antisense probe and confirmed the immunohistochemical results. The double immunofluorescence method revealed Flk-1 expression in all types of hormone-producing adenohypophysial cells but not in folliculostellate cells. The percentage of immunopositive cells varied among the various cell types. The present study demonstrates that pituitary cells are not only sources of VEGF but also targets of this multifunctional substance, supporting the concept that VEGF functions as an autocrine/paracrine factor in the pituitary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".