MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099100558 · doi:10.1109/mecbme.2011.5752102

MVN_CNN and FCNN for endocardial edge detection

2011· article· en· W2099100558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceFuzzy logicEdge detectionComputer visionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Cellular neural networkImage (mathematics)SmoothnessArtificial neural networkImage processingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, Fuzzy Cellular Neural Networks (FCNN) endocardial edge detection is proposed. The echocardiographic image is preprocessed to enhance the contrast and smoothness by utilizing MVN_CNN filtering. FCNN is applied to the smoothed image to extract the heart boundaries. Fuzzy min and max functions are employed. The comparison was made between Fuzzy, CNN and FCNN edge detectors. The FCNN approach showed better results for extracting the LV endocardial edges. Some experimental results are given for different echocardiographic images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it