MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099113998 · doi:10.1029/1999jc900264

Modeling the seasonal variation of sea ice in the Labrador Sea with a coupled multicategory ice model and the Princeton ocean model

2000· article· en· W2099113998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Yao, Charlotte Tang, Ingrid Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSea ice thicknessAdvectionGeologyArctic ice packDrift iceAntarctic sea iceClimatologyIce shelfCryosphereSubmarine pipelineFast iceMelt pondOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a multicategory sea ice model coupled to the Princeton ocean model, which is driven by monthly climatological atmospheric forcing, to study the seasonal variation of ice cover in the Labrador Sea. Initial ocean conditions are derived from a gridded, objectively analyzed temperature‐salinity data set that provides improved resolution of gradients in the vicinity of the shelf break. The model produces a realistic seasonal variation of sea ice. There is ice growth over the inner shelf and ice melt over the outer shelf and slope. Over the inner shelf, advection and diffusion decrease the ice mass; over the outer shelf, advection and diffusion increase the ice mass, which maintains the location of the ice edge. Near the offshore ice edge the melt rate exceeds 1 m per month, and the heat to melt ice together with the heat lost to the atmosphere exceeds 500 W m−2. The heat lost at the ocean surface is compensated for by advection of heat from an offshore convective region. The dominant heat source for the spring retreat of ice in the south is shortwave radiation over the open water fraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207