MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex pheromone of a North American population of the spotted tentiform leafminer, <i>Phyllonorycter blancardella</i>

2005· article· en· W2099116054 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ashraf M. El‐Sayed, L.I. Wainman, Ellen M. Santangelo, C. Rikard Unelius, R. M. Trimble

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pheromone Research and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgricultural Adaptation Council
KeywordsGracillariidaeBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaSex pheromonePheromonePheromone trapPopulationBotanyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The major sex pheromone compound of the spotted tentiform leafminer, Phyllonorycter blancardella (F.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), from Ontario, Canada, was identified as (10 E )‐dodecen‐1‐yl acetate ( E 10‐12:Ac) using chemical analysis and field trapping experiments. The minor compounds (10 E )‐dodecen‐1‐ol ( E 10‐12:OH) ( 4.6%), dodecan‐1‐ol (12:OH) (2.3%), and (10 Z )‐dodecen‐1‐yl acetate ( Z 10‐12:Ac) 1.6% were also identified. The dienic acetate (4 E ,10 E )‐dodecadien‐1‐yl acetate ( E 4, E 10‐12:Ac), a compound reported to be attractive to P. blancardella , was not found in the glands of this population. A two‐component blend of the major and one of each the three minor compounds, in ratios similar to those found in the sex pheromone gland, did not increase the attractiveness of traps baited with synthetic pheromone. The minor compounds E 10‐12:OH and 12:OH were not attractive to P. blancardella when tested individually. Z 10‐12:Ac was attractive to P. blancardella , although traps baited with this compound captured only 2% of the moths that were captured in traps baited with the main compound. A four‐component blend of the major and each of the three minor compounds (100 : 1 : 1 : 1) was not more attractive than the major compound alone. The related species Phyllonorycter mespilella was captured in traps baited with E 10‐12:Ac.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataSame topicInsect Pheromone Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207