MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099120514 · doi:10.7202/031704ar

Le constructivisme en action : des étudiants et des étudiantes se penchent sur leur idée de science

2007· article· fr· W2099120514 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacques Désautels

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la foulée des travaux qui s'inscrivent dans la perspective du constructivisme radical et des divers travaux de recherche que nous menons depuis plusieurs années, nous avons conçu et réalisé une expérimentation qui visait à amener 35 étudiants et étudiantes du collégial à s'interroger sur le processus de production d'un savoir dit scientifique et, plus particulièrement, sur le caractère construit et négocié de ce savoir. L'un des constats les plus marqués que l'on peut dégager de cette recherche est sans contredit le fait que ces étudiants et ces étudiantes se sont révélés de brillants épistémologues et ont su, de façon reflexive, développer une idée de science plus avertie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.407
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207