Pericardium modulates left and right ventricular stroke volumes to compensate for sudden changes in atrial volume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pericardium may modulate acute compensatory changes in stroke volumes seen with sudden changes in cardiac volume, but such a mechanism has never been clearly demonstrated. In eight open-chest dogs, we measured left and right ventricular pressures, diameters, stroke volumes, and pericardial pressures during rapid (approximately 300 ms) systolic infusions or withdrawals of approximately 25 ml blood into and out of the left atrium and right atrium. Control beats, the infusion/withdrawal beat, and 4-10 subsequent beats were studied. With infusions, ipsilateral ventricular end-diastolic transmural pressure, diameter, and stroke volume increased. With the pericardium closed, there was a compensatory decrease in contralateral transmural pressure, diameter, and stroke volume, mediated by opposite changes in transmural end-diastolic pressures. The sum of the ipsilateral increase and contralateral decrease in stroke volume approximated the infused volume. Corresponding changes were seen with blood withdrawals. This direct ventricular interaction was diminished when pericardial pressure was <5 mmHg and absent when the pericardium was opened. Pericardial constraint appears essential for immediate biventricular compensatory responses to acute atrial volume changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".