Speciation in the large-spored clade and establishment of a new species, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reproductive boundaries among species in the large-spored Metschnikowia clade were studied by prototrophic recombinant selection, electrophoretic karyotyping, mitochondrial DNA restriction analysis, and DNA sequence analysis. Inviable ascospores arose from crosses between the two varieties of Metschnikowia continentalis, indicating that they should be recognized as separate species. Prototrophic recombinants were recovered from crosses between auxotrophic mutants of Metschnikowia borealis, M. continentalis, Metschnikowia lochheadii, Metschnikowia sp. UWO(PS)00-154.1, and Candida ipomoeae, showing that some genetic exchange is possible in spite of the sterility of the asci formed in interspecific crosses. Metschnikowia hawaiiensis, although capable of ascus formation when its h(-) mating type is crossed with the h(+) mating type of the other species, did not give rise to recombinants. In the other species, some recombinants acquired the ability to form asci directly from single cells. These often contained the chromosomes of both parents, suggesting formation of allodiploid hybrids. Other recombinants behaved as haploids and were similar to one parent except for having inherited the selectable wild-type allele from the other parent. In most, but not all cases, inheritance of the mitochondrial genome was uniparental and correlated with the inheritance of the nuclear chromosome complement. In some cases, what appeared to be a recombinant mitochondrial genome was observed. Phylogenies derived from the sequences of various DNA regions were not congruent, indicating that hybridization may have taken place in nature as the large-spored species diverged from their common ancestor. Further evidence that C. ipomoeae arose from a natural recombination event was obtained, but a pair of Metschnikowia species that might represent derived forms of the parents could not be identified conclusively. C. ipomoeae and most of its closely related Metschnikowia species contained a group-II intron in the mitochondrial small-subunit ribosomal gene. The intron was absent in M. borealis, M. hawaiiensis, and other species in the genus Metschnikowia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".