MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099195886 · doi:10.1109/nas.2007.42

PKI-Based Authentication Mechanisms in Grid Systems

2007· article· en· W2099195886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic key infrastructureComputer scienceComputer securityAuthentication (law)Grid computingGridPublic-key cryptographyEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grids have emerged as the basic infrastructure for high performance distributed computing and data collaborations. Although they depict an attractive new world of computing, security is the biggest barrier against wide adoption of Grids. Authentication is the basis of security in grids. GSI uses X.509 PKI and proxy certificates as authentication foundation, and uses gateway for mapping certificates between different authentication mechanisms. In this article, we review PKI and PKI-based authentication mechanisms used in grid systems. These mechanisms are insufficient or problematic under some circumstances. We study and analyze some prominent challenges or problems: compatibility across different PKIs, proxy certificate revocation, security weakness, and authentication in ad hoc grids. For each of them, we introduce possible solutions, and analyze state-of-the-art technologies and ongoing researches that indicate the direction of future work on this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207