MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099210588 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1997.610244

Experimental validation of analytical models of flexible structures with bonded piezoelectric film actuators and sensors

2002· article· en· W2099210588 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony Faria Vaz, T.J. Farr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsPiezoelectricityCantileverPolingMaterials sciencePolyvinylidene fluorideActuatorBeam (structure)Finite element methodVibrationPiezoelectric sensorStructural engineeringComposite materialAcousticsFerroelectricityComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsEngineeringPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the interaction equations for a flexible beam with bonded piezoelectric films are empirically verified. Any flexible structure composed of flexible beam members can be analyzed with these equations. The interaction equations account for the effects of shaped piezoelectric films; that is, the film's electrodes may be etched with geometrical shapes and the poling direction may be altered by splicing. The interaction equations make use of the vibrational modes of a structure. The vibrational modes can be derived either analytically or numerically using finite element techniques. Experimental validation has been done on a cantilever beam with bonded polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and lead zirconium titanate (PZT) films. These equations are useful for developing techniques for shape control and active vibration damping inflexible structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207