MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099211592 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2009.090999

Lock step: an algorithm to reduce wi-fi jitter

2009· article· en· W2099211592 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Lin, David McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJitterExponential backoffComputer networkLock (firearm)AlgorithmCollisionIdleTransmission (telecommunications)Key (lock)Network packetReal-time computingThroughputWirelessTelecommunicationsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential backoff algorithm used in IEEE 802.11 does not guarantee short term fairness between flows. We propose an algorithm based on IdleSense where each of N flows tries to transmit every W = 8 N slots; i.e. 8 slots per flow with 7 idle. Each flow adaptively adjusts its contention window W based on the observed proportion of empty slots. One key aspect of Lock Step is setting a deterministic backoff after a successful transmission so that, for persistent flows, eventually all users are in lock step and transmit every 8 N slots. Another key aspect is forcing a second collision between colliding users so all users can better estimate the proportion of idle slots per transmission thus allowing users to estimate N and hence the optimal backoff. This second collision can also be engineered to assist the ZigZag algorithm to decode the colliding packets. Even with transient flows Lock Step reduces jitter and can substantially increase the number of flows carrying Voice over IP traffic through a single access point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207