MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099233547 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2004.1495148

Arranging multiple-aperture MILSATCOM antennas to meet radio regulations

2005· article· en· W2099233547 on OpenAlex
B. Felstead, A. Petosa, Mario Caron

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectional antennaAntenna (radio)Computer scienceConformal antennaAperture (computer memory)Communications satelliteReconfigurable antennaOmnidirectional antennaTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringSatelliteEngineeringSlot antennaAntenna efficiencyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are difficulties in meeting radio regulations for mobile satellite terminals with relatively narrow-beam antennas, such as in the Ka-band. There are advantages to replacing a single antenna with several smaller ones coherently operated. With such a multiple-element antenna, advantage can be taken of the asymmetry of regulations, and of the ability to adjust the element spacing to modify the close-in pattern. In this paper, a two-step methodology is provided for performing these adjustments. An example illustrates how a particular system can be made to meet the regulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207