MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099240625 · doi:10.25011/cim.v33i1.11836

The assessment of atherosclerosis on vascular structures in patients with acute coronary syndrome

2010· article· en· W2099240625 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nihat Kalay, Mikail Yarlıoğlueş, İdris Ardıç, Mustafa Duran, Mehmet Güngör Kaya, Tuğrul İnanç, Ali Doğan, Fatih Koç, Davran Çiçek, Ahmet Kasapkara, Ahmet Çelik, Ramazan Topsakal, Abdurrahman Oğuzhan, Ali Ergin

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyCoronary atherosclerosisAcute coronary syndromeEndothelial dysfunctionBrachial arteryDiabetes mellitusCoronary artery diseaseArteryCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarctionBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Endothelial dysfunction plays a crucial role in the process of atherosclerotic diseases and has been accepted as an early stage of atherosclerosis. Carotid intima-media-thickness (CIMT) and flow-mediated-dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery have been recommended as noninvasive methods to assess endothelial structure and function. Angiographic properties of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are closely associated with cardiovascular events. In this study, we investigated the relation of atherosclerotic properties of coronary, brachial and carotid arteries with CIMT, FMD and coronary angiography in patients with ACS. METHODS: We enrolled 133 patients who were diagnosed with ACS into this study. Exclusion criteria were known coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Coronary angiography, CIMT and FMD were measured in all patients. The numbers of major stenotic coronary vessels with > or = 50% or > or = 70% were defined as diseased vessel. Gensini score was used to evaluate the severity of atherosclerosis. Morphologic properties of stenotic lesion were defined. Cutoff levels were 7% for FMD and 0.9 mm for CIMT. RESULTS: Mean age was 59.7 + or - 11.8 years. FMD, CIMT and Gensini score were 8.3 + or - 5.9%, 0.80 + or - 0.19 mm and 7.8 + or - 3.5, respectively. Only 44% of patients with ACS had impaired FMD. Gensini score, number of diseased vessels and number of critical lesions were higher in patients with impaired FMD. (Gensini: 8.7 + or - 3.6 vs. 7.0 + or - 3.1, p = 0.009, diseased vessels: 2.7 + or - 0.4 vs. 2.3 + or - 0.7, p < 0.0001, critical lesions: 3.0 + or - 2.1 vs. 2.2 + or - 1.4, p = 0.02). Increased CIMT was found in only 33% of patients. Gensini score and number of diseased vessels were significantly higher in patients with increased CIMT. Significant but weak correlations were found between CIMT, FMD and angiographic severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Angiographic properties and lesion morphology were similar between CIMT and FMD groups. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a relationship between CIMT, FMD and severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with ACS. However, in patients with ACS, morphologic properties of stenotic lesions are not associated with CIMT and FMD in brachial artery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207