MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2099309136 · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.018

What Health Care Providers Learn As Caregivers

2005· article· en· W2099309136 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Laverdière, David Lussier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill University Health Centre
FundersMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
KeywordsMedicineDaughterPalliative carePerspective (graphical)Family memberNursingGeriatricsIndependence (probability theory)Family caregiversFace (sociological concept)Terminally illFamily medicineGerontologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As pediatric oncology (C.L.) and geriatrics/ palliative care (D.L.) physicians, we are confronted frequently with end-of-life situations. However, when we were involved in this situation as family members (daughter and sonin-law, respectively), the perspective appeared very different. We thought we were well prepared to face the situation and help our family member fulfill her wishes to stay home to the end of her life and preserve her independence. However, when she gradually deteriorated with the progression of her uterine sarcoma, we quickly felt overwhelmed and powerless. It made us realize, to a greater degree than before, what families have to go through. We learned of specific difficulties related to being both physicians and primary caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→