Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aux Pays-Bas, les pouvoirs publics ont eu recours, depuis les années 1950, au thème de la proximité spatiale afin de tisser le lien social à l’échelle de l’environnement résidentiel des citoyens. Sur le terrain, la promotion de ce lien social est progressivement devenue le corps de pratiques sociales spécifiques, centrées sur l’habitat et la vie de quartier. Mais cette prise en compte précoce du territoire n’a pas empêché que l’essor de l’État social néerlandais soit essentiellement basé sur le principe de la solidarité organique. Cependant, depuis une dizaine d’années, le territoire est également mobilisé dans une autre logique, celle de la réforme de l’État social. Comment les deux logiques d’action publique engageant la notion de territoire peuvent-elles coexister ? Quels sont leurs effets sur la pratique de l’action sociale de proximité dans les quartiers d’habitat social ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".