MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099397480 · doi:10.1680/gein.2003.10.6.200

Design and behaviour of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls constructed on yielding foundations

2003· article· en· W2099397480 on OpenAlexafffund
Graeme D. Skinner, R. Kerry Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringViscoplasticityGeosyntheticsReinforcementFoundation (evidence)Shear strength (soil)GeologyRetaining wallShear (geology)Soil waterSlope stabilityMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringFinite element methodComposite materialConstitutive equationSoil sciencePetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The short- and long-term behaviour of a 6 m high segmental block-faced geosynthetic-reinforced retaining wall constructed on a rigid base and two 10 m thick clay foundations (one relatively inviscous and one viscoplastic) were numerically investigated to assess the effect of yielding in the foundation deposit on the internal and external stability of the wall. The influence of the rate of loading on the undrained shear strength of the viscoplastic foundation clay deposit is examined. The overall short- and long-term behaviour of the reinforced soil wall, including reinforcement strains and deformations, are discussed and compared with the expected design values. It is shown that the viscoplastic nature of some clayey soils can cause a decrease in the undrained shear strength with time by as much as 20% and increase the reinforcement strains by as much as 45% relative to expected design values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosynthetics InternationalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207