MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099441024 · doi:10.1071/ch07144

Direct Measurement of Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of Living Cells Using Surface Forces Apparatus

2007· article· en· W2099441024 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Banquy, Jean‐Michel Rabanel, Patrice Hildgen, Suzanne Giasson

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdhesiveMonolayerAtomic force microscopySubstrate (aquarium)BendingComposite materialElastic modulusMaterials scienceChemistrySurface (topology)NanotechnologyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adhesive and mechanical properties of living cells assembled into a monolayer on two different substrates were investigated using the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique. The force measurements allowed elastic and bending moduli of the cells plated on substrates to be determined. The moduli are in good agreement with data reported in the literature for single cells determined using atomic force microscopy. Results confirm that the nature of the cell–substrate interactions can mediate cell mechanical and adhesive properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207