MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099449314 · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.130

Decision Support for Capacitated Arc Routing for Providing Municipal Waste and Recycling Services

2014· article· en· W2099449314 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aman Preet Singh, Guenther Ruhe, Seyed Abbas Hosseini Amereei, Scott Banack

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArc routingTruckDecision support systemRouting (electronic design automation)Transparency (behavior)Vehicle routing problemWaste collectionComputer scienceOperations researchTransport engineeringEngineeringWaste managementWaste treatmentComputer networkComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the design, development and initial evaluation of a decision support system (DSS) for capacitated arc routing. The research was motivated from a collaboration project with The City of Calgary business unit for Waste &Recycling Services (WRS). Their services cover residential waste collection for 306,000 residential homes. Intelligent decision support was needed to address the increasing business complexity and the need for higher efficiency and transparency of decision-making processes. The proposed routing is incorporating seasonal trends of waste creation. The seasonal changes are between 10.000 (low) to 25000 (peak) tons per month for the whole city. Different arc routings apply for different amounts of waste. A prototype DSS was developed with several components including one for prediction of waste amounts and one for arc routing of trucks. The paper describes the methodology, the existing DSS-WRS prototype implementation and preliminary results from its case study implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207