Évaluation d’un programme de prévention de la violence au premier cycle du primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de l'évaluation de l'implantation et des impacts du programme de prévention de la violence chez des élèves du premier cycle du primaire. Ce programme a été implanté dans 17 classes de 6 écoles de l'île de Montréal réparties dans deux strates de défavorisation socioéconomique (faible et élevée). L'analyse révèle des gains statisquement significatifs sur les plans de la prosocialité et des habiletés sociocognitives à la résolution de conflits chez les élèves qui ont participé à plus de 50% des activités du programme. La qualité de la mise en oeuvre du programme s'est révélée une variable importante dans l'efficacité du programme. Les résultats soulèvent des points de discussion concernant les facteurs qui ont influencé la qualité de l'implantation du programme et l'importance des gains réalisés par les élèves sur les plans comportemental et sociocognitif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".