El empleo de la Webmetría para el análisis de los indicadores de desempeño y posición financiera de la empresa: un análisis exploratorio en diversos sectores económicos de los Estados Unidos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El desarrollo de Internet a lo largo de las dos últimas décadas ha dado lugar a una nueva disciplina que permite estudiar la Web desde un punto de vista cuantitativo: la webmetría. La aplicación de técnicas webmétricas al estudio de empresas apunta a la posible existencia de relaciones entre el número de enlaces que recibe un sitio web corporativo y determinadas variables económico-financieras. La incipiente evidencia encontrada se limita, en todo caso, a empresas pertenecientes a sectores tecnológicos que, por su propia naturaleza, cuentan con una fuerte presencia en la Red. El presente trabajo, de carácter exploratorio, extiende el análisis a diversos sectores económicos de los Estados Unidos, confirmando la existencia de una relación significativa entre las variables expuestas. Esto abre nuevas posibilidades de investigación en el ámbito empresarial a partir del empleo de la información extraída de la estructura de enlaces de la Web.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".