MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099489245 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2011.2108267

Time-Domain Modeling of Nonlinear Optical Structures With Extended Stability FDTD Schemes

2011· article· en· W2099489245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodNonlinear systemFinite difference methodStability (learning theory)MathematicsLimit (mathematics)Time domainOpticsMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two numerical methodologies based on the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique are formulated and applied to model optical structures with Raman and Kerr type nonlinearities. The first scheme is based on the alternating-direction implicit finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD), while the second one is based on a recently introduced spatially filtered FDTD method. Both methods are able to extend FDTD time steps beyond the conventional Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy stability limit. It is demonstrated that both methods are significantly faster than the standard nonlinear FDTD, while maintaining its level of accuracy. Their potential as design and analysis tools for nonlinear periodic structures is demonstrated with the study of a 1-D problem involving a nonlinear Bragg reflector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it