Approche sémiotique exploratoire des paraboles et des images langagières du Sutra du Lotus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’attache aux paraboles et aux images langagières de la version chinoise du Su̅tra du Lotus, traduit du sanskrit par Kuma̅rajīva en 406. Il souligne le rôle sémiotique que les métaphores filées revêtent dans cette Écriture en tant que signes évocateurs de la bouddhéité, à savoir d’une dimension qui n’est ni sensible ni intelligible, puisqu’elle suppose la disparition de tous les phénomènes et le dépassement de l’illusion identitaire. En exploitant la notion de semiosis illimitée, l’auteure cherche à comprendre quel type d’herméneutique est suggéré dans le texte à ses récepteurs (les lecteurs, les pratiquants) pour atteindre la vacuité et le salut. L’extinction totale et parfaite de la souffrance entraîne, en effet, la déconstruction ontologique de l’enchaînement causal qui régit non seulement le saṃsa̅ra, mais également les systèmes des signes et des significations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".