MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099505678 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.120334

Pain Management by Pharmacotherapy in Inflammatory Arthritis. Systematic Literature Reviews of the 3e Initiative 2010

2012· article· en· W2099505678 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. M. van der HEIJDE

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatologyRheumatoid arthritisPharmacotherapyMultinational corporationPhysical therapyInflammatory arthritisAlternative medicineMethotrexatePsoriatic arthritisSystematic reviewTask forceArthritisInternal medicineMEDLINEIntensive care medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 3e Initiative (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) is a multinational task force devoted to producing evidence-based recommendations for daily clinical practice in Rheumatology. It is a combination of systematically generated evidence and expert opinions of an international panel of rheumatologists. Since 2006, the 3e initiative has addressed successively the management of Ankylosing Spondylitis1, the use of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis2, and the management of patients with Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis (UPIA)3, resulting in multinational recommendations on these topics. The 2010 3e collaboration’s objective was to elaborate recommendations on how to manage musculoskeletal pain by pharmacotherapy in inflammatory arthritis, which …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.007
Bibliometrics0.0170.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207