MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099508202 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2011.2109711

Minimizing the Effect of Sampling Jitters in Wireless Sensor Networks

2011· article· en· W2099508202 on OpenAlexaff
Salman Ahmed, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)Wireless sensor networkDiscretizationComputer scienceInvariant (physics)AlgorithmJitterSynchronization (alternating current)Mathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)Filter (signal processing)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsComputer networkMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of low-cost and energy-limited sensors to measure a distributed phenomenon. The finite energy constraint limits the synchronization of sensors at every sampling instant which introduces sampling jitters. In this letter, we model sampling jitters using fractional delay transfer functions. The WSN is modeled using a hybrid multirate filter bank where the objective is to design discrete-time, causal and stable synthesis filters to minimize the effect of sampling jitters. Using a norm-invariant discretization, the hybrid and multirate problem is reduced to a model-matchingH2optimization problem involving linear time-invariant and discrete-time systems. A numerical example is also presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207