MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099516645 · doi:10.1128/jvi.02306-13

Mitochondrial Nucleases ENDOG and EXOG Participate in Mitochondrial DNA Depletion Initiated by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 UL12.5

2013· article· en· W2099516645 on OpenAlexafffund
Brett A. Duguay, James R. Smiley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyMitochondrial DNAHerpes simplex virusVirologyDNAMitochondrionGeneticsVirusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) rapidly eliminates mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from infected cells, an effect that is mediated by UL12.5, a mitochondrial isoform of the viral alkaline nuclease UL12. Our initial hypothesis was that UL12.5 directly degrades mtDNA via its nuclease activity. However, we show here that the nuclease activities of UL12.5 are not required for mtDNA loss. This observation led us to examine whether cellular nucleases mediate the mtDNA loss provoked by UL12.5. We provide evidence that the mitochondrial nucleases endonuclease G (ENDOG) and endonuclease G-like 1 (EXOG) play key redundant roles in UL12.5-mediated mtDNA depletion. Overall, our data indicate that UL12.5 deploys cellular proteins, including ENDOG and EXOG, to destroy mtDNA and contribute to a growing body of literature highlighting roles for ENDOG and EXOG in mtDNA maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207