Devis sociotechniques pour l’établissement de communautés d’apprentissage en réseau pour l’intégration pédagogique des TIC en formation des maîtres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose un cadre conceptuel pour le renouvellement des pratiques de formation des enseignants, pratiques issues de l’intégration pédagogique des technologies de l’information et de la communication, elle-même orientée vers l’apprentissage en collaboration. Adoptant une perspective socioconstructiviste et une méthodologie d’expérimentation de devis socio-techniques ( design experiments ), les chercheurs formulent treize principes de conception de l’intégration des TIC pour favoriser l’interaction sociale au sein et entre des communautés d’apprentissage. Ces résultats proviennent de plusieurs cycles d’expérimentation effectués en quatre contextes différents. Ils dégagent ensuite des conditions de réussite de l’intégration pédagogique de ces nouveaux outils pour le renouvellement de la formation des enseignants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".