MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099561761 · doi:10.7202/1002521ar

Faire de sa vie une oeuvre d’art paralittéraire

2011· article· fr· W2099561761 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Benoît Denis

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abattu le jour des Morts 1979 par la brigade anti-gang du commissaire Broussard, le truand Jacques Mesrine a longtemps défrayé la chronique médiatique et fait aujourd’hui figure de mythe. L’une des raisons de cette postérité tient sans doute à la capacité que le gangster a eue de se placer au centre d’une intense production textuelle, dont le noyau est sa propre autobiographie, significativement intitulée L’instinct de mort (1974). La trajectoire de Mesrine, conçue par le protagoniste comme un choix transformant sa vie en destin dont la fin est d’emblée connue, et la constante mise en scène de soi qui l’accompagne, se soumettent intégralement à un récit collectif préexistant, vaste intertexte paralittéraire que Foucault appelait la « saga monotone des grands criminels ». Le but de cette contribution est de montrer que, dans la conjoncture singulière des années pompidoliennes et giscardiennes, le « roman-Mesrine » mobilise successivement deux figures antithétiques : celle du « hors-la-loi », présentée comme ultime avatar de l’aventurier romantique ; et celle de « l’ennemi public », qui permet de transformer la révolte individuelle en cause politique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes françaisesSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207