MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099574404 · doi:10.1644/13-mamm-a-165

Identification of the baculum in American pika (<i>Ochotona princeps</i>: Lagomorpha) from southwestern Alberta, Canada

2014· article· en· W2099574404 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bill Weimann, Mark A. Edwards, Christopher N. Jass

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alberta Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPikaZoologyBiologyAnatomyPhylogenetic treeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discovered hard structures that resembled bone in the penis of 20 specimens of male American pikas (Ochotona princeps) from the Rocky Mountains of southwestern Alberta, Canada. Histological sections of these structures showed features consistent with cortical bone and osteocytes, and scanning electron microscopy analyses indicated peaks in calcium and phosphorous. The anatomical positioning, internal texture, and elemental composition indicate that the structures are bacula. The presence of a baculum in O. princeps demonstrates that there is a greater phylogenetic distribution of this feature among Mammalia than commonly recognized, and it indicates that the absence of a baculum is not a derived character state for Lagomorpha.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MammalogySame topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207