MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099594620 · doi:10.1364/oe.22.010579

Analytical modeling of XPM in dispersion-managed coherent fiber-optic systems

2014· article· en· W2099594620 on OpenAlex
Xiaojun Liang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-phase modulationOpticsGaussianSelf-phase modulationPhysicsPulse (music)Dispersion (optics)Perturbation (astronomy)Phase modulationNonlinear opticsQuantum mechanicsPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical model for the cross-phase modulation (XPM) variance in dispersion-managed coherent fiber-optic systems is developed based on the first order perturbation theory. The XPM variance is analytically calculated for arbitrary pulse shapes. For a non-Gaussian pulse, the summation of time-shifted Gaussian pulses is used to fit the target pulse shape, which not only provides a good approximation of the non-Gaussian pulse but also allows explicit derivation of the XPM variance. The analytically estimated XPM variance is found to be in good agreement with numerical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it