Vocal Tract Length Perturbation (VTLP) improves speech recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Augmenting datasets by transforming inputs in a way that does not change the label is a crucial ingredient of the state of the art methods for object recognition using neural networks. However this approach has (to our knowledge) not been exploited successfully in speech recognition (with or without neural networks). In this paper we lay the foundation for this approach, and show one way of augmenting speech datasets by transforming spectrograms, using a random linear warping along the frequency dimension. In practice this can be achieved by using warping techniques that are used for vocal tract length normalization (VTLN)- with the difference that a warp factor is generated randomly each time, during training, rather than fitting a single warp factor to each training and test speaker (or utterance). At test time, a prediction is made by averaging the predictions over multiple warp factors. When this technique is applied to TIMIT using Deep Neural Networks (DNN) of different depths, the Phone Error Rate (PER) improved by an average of 0.65 % on the test set. For a Convolutional neural network (CNN) with convolutional layer in the bottom, a gain of 1.0 % was observed. These improvements were achieved without increasing the number of training epochs, and suggest that data transformations should be an important component of training neural networks for speech, especially for data limited projects. Proceedings of the 30 th
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".