MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099628409 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1994.389704

Multi-band residual coding of CELP codecs at 8 kb/s

2002· article· en· W2099628409 on OpenAlexaff
P. Mermelstein, P. Zheng, M. Saikaly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode-excited linear predictionVector sum excited linear predictionResidualCodecSpeech codingComputer scienceSpeech recognitionCoding (social sciences)Codec2Linear predictive codingHarmonic Vector Excitation CodingAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore the benefits for CELP coding of speech at 8 kb/s of dividing the residual signal after pitch filtering into three band-passed components and using separate codebooks to represent each component. Minimization of the perceptually weighted error between the input signal and the reconstructed signal is divided into several band-limited minimization operations where the lowest frequency match dominates the quality of the result. For equal total numbers of bits allocated to code the residual in a 5 ms frame, spectral division of the coding operation results on the average in a better match than temporal division into subframes. These results permit the design of a high quality speech codec at 8 kb/s with modest delay and low complexity.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207