MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099632205 · doi:10.1109/csb.2004.158

State-space model for gene regulatory networks with time delays

2004· article· en· W2099632205 on OpenAlexaff
Fang‐Xiang Wu, Wenjun Zhang, Anthony Kusalik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene regulatory networkExpression (computer science)Principal component analysisDynamic Bayesian networkComputer scienceState spaceState-space representationBayesian networkState (computer science)Probabilistic logicBayesian information criterionGene expressionGeneMathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceStatisticsGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes a state-space model to account for time delays in gene regulatory network. This model views genes as the observation variables, whose expression values depend on the current internal state variables and any external inputs. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) are used to estimate the number of internal state variables and their expression profiles from gene expression data. By constructing dynamic equations with time delays for the internal state variables and the relationships between them and the observation variables (gene expression profiles), state-space models for gene regulatory networks with time delays are realized. The parameters of the proposed model may be unambiguously identified from time-course gene expression data with low computational cost. The method is applied to one timecourse gene expression dataset, and the modes constructed. The results show that not only is the model (almost) stable, but also it has better prediction accuracy than a model without incorporating time delay. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207