Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article se propose de montrer que l’usage des objets sportifs comme référents identitaires est relativement exemplaire des changements plus vastes faisant de la consommation un élément important de l’affirmation de soi. La déstabilisation des grands repères symboliques de nos sociétés a donné à ces objets banalisés, généralement peu durables, produits et vendus à l’échelle internationale, une importance qui va bien au-delà de leur utilité. Les dimensions émotionnelles et narratives des spectacles sportifs organisent une trame, largement exploitée par le marketing, dans laquelle les marchandises se chargent de sens. De nombreux usages non sportifs des produits se font en référence à la médiatisation des spectacles sportifs, mais les usages ne peuvent se réduire à cela. La diffusion de la culture de la pratique sportive explique d’autres usages des objets sportifs dans lesquels s’expriment et se rappellent également des émotions et des liens sociaux. Ce travail montre, en s’appuyant sur l’exemple français, que les usages des objets sportifs reflètent des mutations du symbolique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".