Search for narrow diphoton resonances and for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math>signatures in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>¯</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow/></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn><mml:mn/><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present results of searches for diphoton resonances produced both inclusively and also in association with a vector boson $(W$ or $Z)$ using $100 {\mathrm{pb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of $p\overline{p}$ collisions using the CDF detector. We set upper limits on the product of cross section times branching ratio for both $p\overline{p}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}+X$ and $p\overline{p}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}+W/Z.$ Comparing the inclusive production to the expectations from heavy sgoldstinos we derive limits on the supersymmetry-breaking scale $\sqrt{F}$ in the TeV range, depending on the sgoldstino mass and the choice of other parameters. Also, using a NLO prediction for the associated production of a Higgs boson with a W or Z boson, we set an upper limit on the branching ratio for $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{H}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}.$ Finally, we set a lower limit on the mass of a ``bosophilic'' Higgs boson (e.g., one which couples only to $\ensuremath{\gamma},$ W, and Z bosons with standard model couplings) of $82 \mathrm{GeV}{/c}^{2}$ at 95% confidence level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".