Therapeutic hypercapnia prevents chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the newborn rat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Induction of hypercapnia by breathing high concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) may have beneficial effects on the pulmonary circulation. We tested the hypothesis that exposure to CO(2) would protect against chronic pulmonary hypertension in newborn rats. Atmospheric CO(2) was maintained at <0.5% (normocapnia), 5.5%, or 10% during exposure from birth for 14 days to normoxia (21% O(2)) or moderate hypoxia (13% O(2)). Pulmonary vascular and hemodynamic abnormalities in animals exposed to chronic hypoxia included increased pulmonary arterial resistance, right ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction, medial thickening of pulmonary resistance arteries, and distal arterial muscularization. Exposure to 10% CO(2) (but not to 5.5% CO(2)) significantly attenuated pulmonary vascular remodeling and increased pulmonary arterial resistance in hypoxia-exposed animals (P < 0.05), whereas both concentrations of CO(2) normalized right ventricular performance. Exposure to 10% CO(2) attenuated increased oxidant stress induced by hypoxia, as quantified by 8-isoprostane content in the lung, and prevented upregulation of endothelin-1, a critical mediator of pulmonary vascular remodeling. We conclude that hypercapnic acidosis has beneficial effects on pulmonary hypertension and vascular remodeling induced by chronic hypoxia, which we speculate derives from antioxidant properties of CO(2) on the lung and consequent modulating effects on the endothelin pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it