MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2099749234

Tracking Melt-Freeze Crust Evolution

2012· article· en· W2099749234 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan Buhler, Sascha Bellaire, Bruce Jamieson

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrustGeologyTracking (education)SlabMetamorphismUpper crustLithosphereGeophysicsMineralogyPetrologySeismologyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melt-freeze crusts are one of the most critical layers for slab avalanche formation. These layers usually undergo complex metamorphism and associated snow cover stability may increase or decrease over time. Typical field observations are of a subjective nature and hence tracking changes to these layers can be inconsistent amongst multiple observers. In order to improve the way melt-freeze crusts are observed we present three tracking systems used over the 2011-12 winter season: a set of quantitative measurements, a simple new crust index (CI), and the use of a thermal imager. During the winter season 2011-12, six melt-freeze crusts were tracked over time with these methods in the Columbia Mountains, British Columbia, Canada. The physical properties of a melt-freeze crust can be best described using a set of quantitative measurements shear frame, push gauge and density – but these may be operationally impractical. The crust index consists of two parts: the first part describes the bonding at the upper and lower interface of a melt-freeze crust; the second part describes the internal lamination or bonding within the crust. In addition, a thermal camera was used to measure small scale temperature gradients. This allowed us to monitor changes in the temperature gradient over time above and below melt-freeze crusts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska→Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→