Tamoxifen inhibits Na<sup>+</sup>and K<sup>+</sup>currents in rat ventricular myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tamoxifen is an estrogen receptor antagonist used in the treatment of breast cancer. However, tamoxifen has been shown to induce QT prolongation of the electrocardiogram, thereby potentially causing life-threatening polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the electrophysiological mechanism(s) that underlie the arrhythmogenic effects of tamoxifen. We used standard ruptured whole cell and perforated patch-clamping techniques on rat ventricular myocytes to investigate the effects of tamoxifen on cardiac action potential (AP) waveforms and the underlying K+ currents. Tamoxifen (3 micromol/l) markedly prolonged AP duration, decreased maximal rate of depolarization, and decreased resting membrane potential. At this concentration, tamoxifen significantly depressed the Ca2+-independent transient outward K+ current (Ito), sustained outward delayed rectifier K+ current (Isus), inward rectifier K+ current (IK1), and Na+ current (INa) in the myocytes. Lower concentrations of tamoxifen (1 micromol/l) also decreased the resting membrane potential and significantly depressed IK1 to 79 +/- 5% (n = 5; at -120 mV) of pretreatment values. The results of this study indicate that inhibition of Ito, Isus, and IK1 by tamoxifen may underlie AP prolongation in cardiac myocytes and thereby contribute to prolonged QT interval observed in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".