MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099767352 · doi:10.1651/s-2687.1

Behavioral Responses of Crayfish to a Reflective Environment

2006· article· en· W2099767352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crustacean Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrayfishBiologyProcambarus clarkiiFront (military)ZoologyAnatomyEcologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study examined the effects of visual cues provided by a reflective environment on spontaneous behavior exhibited by crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in an empty aquarium. The predominant components of spontaneous behavior were determined by observing the activity of solitary adult crayfish for 20 minutes in a glass aquarium containing fresh water and no objects. Five distinct behaviors were observed: rearing up (climbing on the wall), turning, cornering (facing the corner for |$5\, {\text{s}}$| or longer), backward walking, and crossing (crossing the midline of the aquarium). The frequencies of rearing up, cornering, and turning decreased when reflection from the glass wall was blocked with black cardboard or non-reflective plastic. In a tank containing mirrors on one side and non-reflective plastic on the other, crayfish cornered, reared up, and turned more in front of the mirrors. To examine whether or not such responses depend on socialization, crayfish were housed for two weeks either in same-sex pairs (socialized) or separately (isolated), and subsequently their behaviors were compared in a tank with mirrors on one side and non-reflective plastic on the other. Crayfish that had been housed in isolation showed no difference in rearing up, turning, cornering, or backward walking between the mirror and non-mirrored portions of the tank. Crayfish housed in pairs showed significantly more of all five behaviors in front of the mirrors than in the non-mirrored portions of the tank, and they spent significantly more time in front of the mirrors than in the non-mirrored part of the tank. On the other hand, isolated crayfish seemed to avoid the mirrored side. The results demonstrate that crayfish are sensitive to reflection, even the partial reflection present in an ordinary glass tank, and that responses of crayfish to a reflective environment depend on prior socialization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it