Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Verify experimentally the theoretical prediction of F. Tessier and I. Kawrakow [Med. Phys. 37, 96-107 (2010)] that it is possible to design a thimble ionization chamber with no shift in its effective point of measurement (EPOM), i.e., a chamber that provides a measure of the dose to the medium at the location of its central axis. METHODS: Measure dose from a 25 MV photon beam incident on water with an Exradin A1SL ionization chamber inside a thin sleeve (as a means of effectively increasing the thimble wall thickness). The depth-dose curve is compared to that obtained using a well-characterized PTW Roos parallel-plate chamber. RESULTS: With an appropriate increase in thimble wall thickness, the EPOM shift of the Exradin A1SL vanishes. Further increase of the wall thickness yields a chamber with a positive (downstream) shift in its point of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to design a thimble ionization chamber with a zero EPOM shift by adjusting the wall thickness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".