MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099796372

A complete Classification of Lienard equation

2013· article· en· W2099796372 on OpenAlexaff
Halim Zeghdoudi, Lahsen Bouchahed, Raouf Dridi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsZero (linguistics)Scalar (mathematics)Liénard equationHomogeneous spaceDerivative (finance)Function (biology)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisDifferential equationGeometryOrdinary differential equationExact differential equation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider scalar Lienard equations ¨x(t) = f (x(t))˙x(t)+ g(x(t)), x(t) 2R (1) and the diffeomorphisms ' : R2!R2 in the form phi(x, t) = (beta(x), a.t +apha(x)) (2) where the derivative of the function is non zero and where the real number a is non zero. The aim result of this paper is to study the symmetries in the form given by (2) for the equation (1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207