MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099807018 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2009.5410901

Two level decomposition based matrix multiplication for FPGAs

2009· article· en· W2099807018 on OpenAlexaff
Shuli Gao, D. Al-Khalili, Noureddine Chabini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayMultiplier (economics)Computer scienceMatrix multiplicationParallel computingMultiplication (music)Matrix (chemical analysis)Block (permutation group theory)ArithmeticComputer hardwareMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an efficient design approach for the implementation of large size matrix multiplication with wide bit size elements targeting FPGAs. The proposed technique first partitions the input matrices into smaller dimensions, and then segment the word-width of the elements into smaller sections. The segmentation is driven by the architecture of the targeted FPGA platform. A highly optimized scalar signed multiplier has been developed, and used as a basic block to construct a 2 by 2 matrix multiplier on Xilinx' and Altera's FPGAs. The result of the implementations showed that our method has outperformed the techniques utilized by commercial tools, ISE and Quartus, and the balanced word-width decomposition approach to realize the matrix multiplications proposed in. Compared to these approaches we achieved delay reduction range from 7.1% to 28% and area saving range from 6.7% to 32%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207