Analysis of secondary metabolites from <i>eschscholtzia californica</i> by high‐performance liquid chromatography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A rapid and precise analytical HPLC method has been developed for screening the major benzophenanthridine alkaloids produced by cell cultures of Eschscholtzia califomica, namely, sanguinarine, chelirubine, macarpine, chelerythrine and chelilutine. Separation was achieved on a C18, reversed-phase column with gradient elution using acetonitrile and 50 mM phosphoric acid. Detection was performed by both fluorescence (lambda(ex) 330 nm, lambda(em) 570 nm) and photodiode array, leading to good selectivity and precision in determining peak purity. A simple and quick sample preparation protocol was elaborated involving a methanolic extraction for the measurement of intracellular concentrations of the alkaloids and a solid phase extraction for their quantification in culture medium. Owing to the non-availability of commercially standards, a method for the purification of chelirubine, macar pine and chelilutine by semi-preparative HPLC was developed. Coupled together, the isolation method and the analytical method were highly reliable for screening the alkaloids of interest produced by E. califomica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it