Solidarités environnementales, contestation transnationale et renouvellement de la politique mondiale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ordre politique de la mondialisation est un champ conflictuel de relations économiques, culturelles et sociales au sein duquel les mouvements sociaux transnationaux construisent une nouvelle politique située au-delà des institutions traditionnelles. Cet article vise à proposer un cadre d´analyse théorique illustré à partir de la contribution d´un mouvement reconnu sur la scène internationale qui a réussi à mener une action politique transnationale dans le champ de l´environnementalisme. Dans ce cadre, les auteurs soulignent la convergence de six catégories d’analyse de l´action collective mise en oeuvre par les mouvements de protection de l´environnement. Les six catégories suggérées (statut de compétence, articulation des échelles, temporalité, multiplicité des identités et des représentations, structure organisationnelle, visibilité) mettent en relief le besoin de reconsidérer le sens hégémonique de la politique mondiale fondée exclusivement sur le marché et les négociations interétatiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".