MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099840350 · doi:10.1109/bmsb.2012.6264267

Disparity-compensated reconstruction of frame-compatible 3D videos

2012· article· en· W2099840350 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Zhang, Wei Li, Demin Wang, Zheng Dong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceFrame (networking)Compensation (psychology)Iterative reconstructionImage resolutionMotion compensationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an algorithm for the reconstruction of frame-compatible 3D videos. Disparity-compensation based framework is investigated for the up-conversion of complementarily, horizontally or vertically decimated frame-compatible formats to their original 2D full resolution. Two issues, namely spatial resolution of disparity maps and intensity/color differences of stereo image, that affect image quality of full-resolution images reconstructed using the disparity compensation technique are studied. To deal with the intensity/color imbalance between stereo images, a new algorithm is proposed for the reconstruction. Experimetal results with four sequences confirmed the outcomes of the studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207