MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TIME TO THEATRE AND INFECTION

2007· letter· en· W2099877903 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jones Quain

Bibliographic record

VenueANZ Journal of Surgery · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOpen fracturePresentation (obstetrics)Long boneIntensive care medicineGeneral surgerySurgeryOrthopedic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time for definitive treatment of open long-bone fractures by tradition and for many years has been arbitrarily set at less than 6 h to minimize infection, to obtain primary union and to maximize soft tissue healing. Where the figure of 6 h arose appears lost in orthopaedic folklore as there is no scientific basis or documented clinical research to support this. It appears to have arisen around the time of the Vietnam war in the early 1970s and until recently has been accepted. Indeed, time to theatre in less than 6 h for open long-bone fractures is still a clinical indicator for the statistics gathered by the NSW Trauma Committee. In recent years, however, the timing to definitive treatment has been questioned and other factors such as the severity of the injury, according to the Gustilo and Anderson classification, and experience and availability of surgical and nursing staff have been evaluated. It is appropriate, therefore, that this article by Sungaran et al. should examine the time to definitive treatment in a busy trauma unit in the Australian setting. Although there is growing concern about hospital-acquired infections and the development of multiresistant organisms, there is no doubt that the appropriate use of high-dose intravenous antibiotics at the time of presentation of an open fracture has had an important beneficial effect on the rate of infection. Other factors to be considered in the timing of the operative procedure include the surgeon’s experience, possible fatigue, availability and experience of anaesthetic staff, availability of the most appropriate implant, experience and availability of a radiographer and the experience of nursing staff. In places other than major trauma centres, the scrub nurse maybe junior, inexperienced or often agency staff, unfamiliar with the type of fixation; this can be compounded by a junior radiographer on call, leading to prolongation of the operative procedure and potentially deleterious effect on the outcome.2 The conclusion of the authors that delaying surgical treatment in patients with open fractures until the optimum operating environment can be provided is justified by their statistical analysis and is supported by other papers, which they quote by Harley from Canada,3Charalambous4 as well as similar conclusions being reached by Skaggs from The Childrens Hospital in Los Angeles.5 The overall infection rate in these open fractures of the tibia in the Liverpool Hospital Group of 3.7% compares favourably with other papers published and as noted relates directly to the severity (grade 3) of the injury. Definitive treatment of open long-bone fractures within 6 h should therefore be relegated to orthopaedic history and no longer regarded as a benchmark of satisfactory treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANZ Journal of SurgerySame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207